You’re reading the Apple Newsroom

Apple cautions against global consequences of UK’s proposed surveillance law reforms

Abdul Raouf Al Sbeei
Abdul Raouf Al Sbeei - Apple Reporter
3 Min Read

Apple has issued a strong statement against proposed amendments to the United Kingdom‘s Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) according to a new report by Ars Technica. These changes, Apple warns, could have far-reaching consequences for user privacy and security around the world.

The IPA was initially enacted in 2016 to ensure that UK officials have lawful access to user data to investigate crimes such as child sexual exploitation and terrorism. However, the proposed amendments, which are currently being debated in the House of Lords, would require any company that fields government data requests to notify officials of any updates they planned to make that could restrict the UK government’s access to this data, including updates impacting users outside the country.

Apple has expressed deep concern over these proposed changes, arguing that they would “place users’ privacy and security at risk.” The tech giant has even threatened to leave the UK market and to remove iMessage and FaceTime if the amendments are passed, as they could force Apple to “secretly veto new user protections globally, preventing us from ever offering them to customers.”

The UK government, on the other hand, maintains that these changes do not provide powers for the Secretary of State to approve or refuse technical changes, but simply require companies to inform the Secretary of State of relevant changes before they are implemented. The Home Office has also claimed that “these changes do not directly relate to end-to-end encryption.”

However, privacy advocates and tech companies remain skeptical, as they believe that the amendments could undermine end-to-end encryption and transform private companies into “arms of the surveillance state.” Furthermore, the proposed changes could potentially conflict with EU and US laws, including the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, which is considered the world’s strongest privacy law.

As the debate over the proposed amendments continues, it is essential to consider the potential global implications of these changes. The outcome of this debate could significantly impact not only UK users, but also users worldwide, as they could be deprived of important new privacy and security features.

Share this Article

Editor's Pick

Supercharged is not just another news outlet. We’re a platform on a mission to offer personalized and ad-free news directly to you. Discover more of Supercharged.

You’re reading the Apple Newsroom

  • Loading stock data...

Apple cautions against global consequences of UK’s proposed surveillance law reforms

Abdul Raouf Al Sbeei
Abdul Raouf Al Sbeei - Apple Reporter
3 Min Read

Apple has issued a strong statement against proposed amendments to the United Kingdom‘s Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) according to a new report by Ars Technica. These changes, Apple warns, could have far-reaching consequences for user privacy and security around the world.

The IPA was initially enacted in 2016 to ensure that UK officials have lawful access to user data to investigate crimes such as child sexual exploitation and terrorism. However, the proposed amendments, which are currently being debated in the House of Lords, would require any company that fields government data requests to notify officials of any updates they planned to make that could restrict the UK government’s access to this data, including updates impacting users outside the country.

Apple has expressed deep concern over these proposed changes, arguing that they would “place users’ privacy and security at risk.” The tech giant has even threatened to leave the UK market and to remove iMessage and FaceTime if the amendments are passed, as they could force Apple to “secretly veto new user protections globally, preventing us from ever offering them to customers.”

The UK government, on the other hand, maintains that these changes do not provide powers for the Secretary of State to approve or refuse technical changes, but simply require companies to inform the Secretary of State of relevant changes before they are implemented. The Home Office has also claimed that “these changes do not directly relate to end-to-end encryption.”

However, privacy advocates and tech companies remain skeptical, as they believe that the amendments could undermine end-to-end encryption and transform private companies into “arms of the surveillance state.” Furthermore, the proposed changes could potentially conflict with EU and US laws, including the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, which is considered the world’s strongest privacy law.

As the debate over the proposed amendments continues, it is essential to consider the potential global implications of these changes. The outcome of this debate could significantly impact not only UK users, but also users worldwide, as they could be deprived of important new privacy and security features.

Share this Article
Secured By miniOrange