Apple’s AirDrop finds itself at the center of a new controversy stemming from claims by a Beijing agency, according to a new report by Bloomberg. The agency alleges it has developed a technique to identify users who send content via AirDrop, a development potentially linked to China’s ongoing efforts to control online information.
According to an online post by Beijing’s judicial bureau, the institute responsible for the claimed breakthrough analyzed encrypted device logs on iPhones to unveil the contact information of AirDrop senders. The agency cites this method as instrumental in identifying “multiple suspects” involved in sharing “inappropriate remarks.” Whether arrests were made remains unclear.
This declaration casts renewed light on AirDrop’s role in activism worldwide. During the 2019 Hong Kong protests, the feature served as a crucial tool for demonstrators to disseminate pro-democracy messages anonymously. Its proximity-based file sharing bypassed traditional communication channels, making it difficult for authorities to track. Apple has not yet responded to requests for comment regarding the Beijing agency’s claims.
The reported “technological breakthrough” raises concerns for user privacy and freedom of expression. It could potentially serve as an additional tool in China’s ongoing campaign to eradicate content deemed “unhealthy.” This development further complicates Apple’s operations in the country, where the tech giant already faces stringent content restrictions across various platforms. In response to its use by protesters in 2022, AirDrop functionality on Chinese iPhones was significantly limited.
Beyond privacy concerns, the incident points to broader challenges for Apple. Mounting pressure from the Chinese government, including bans on foreign devices in many state-owned institutions, adds to the company’s existing sales struggles in the region.
While the full capabilities and limitations of the alleged AirDrop identification method remain shrouded in uncertainty, its mere existence adds to the complexities surrounding technology and online freedom in China.
